New referees can often raise new sets of points, which complicates and lengthens the consideration process instead of simplifying it. These are considered appeals, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions. Referees are chosen for the following reasons: Although Nature's editors themselves judge whether a paper is likely to interest readers outside its own immediate field, referees often give helpful advice, for example if the work described is not as significant as the editors thought or has undersold its significance. We argue that there is an additional reason for researchers to respect the dissent . All manuscripts are handled electronically throughout the consideration process. Report: Pending. More importantly, in the rejection letter it was evident that the Editor had taken the time to read through our manuscript and had given it some thought . In recognition of the time and expertise our reviewers provide toNatures editorial process, we formally acknowledge their contribution to the external peer review of articles published in the journal. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Is there a role for assent or dissent in animal research? "Editor decision started" means that the editor is actively reading the manuscript. Although Nature's editors regard it as essential that any technical failings noted by referees are addressed, they are not so strictly bound by referees editorial opinions as to whether the work belongs in Nature. The Peer Review Process | Wiley Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. Revised Submission Nearly all manuscripts are returned to the author with suggestions for revision, condensation, or final polish. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. //-->Editorial Process | American Association for Cancer Research GSA Bulletin: https://gsabulletin.msubmit.net Generally, only one letter defending your submission will be accepted for each of the review stages (editorial review and peer review). Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final resubmission to avoid delays towards formal acceptance. This scheme only applies to original research Articles, and not to Review articles or to other published content. The paper is accepted for publication without any further changes required from the authors. The editor contacts potential reviewers to ask them to review the manuscript. Depending upon the nature of the revisions, the revised paper may be sent out for additional review or it may be accepted directly. Authors will be contacted immediately after a decision has been made. Decisions are quicker, and editorial criteria can be made uniform across disciplines. A referee might be selected for expertise in only one area, for example to judge if a statistical analysis is appropriate, or if a particular technique that is essential to underpin the conclusion has been undertaken properly. All Articles published in Nature go through at least one round of review, usually two or three, sometimes more. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles The criteria for publication of scientific papers (Articles) in Nature are that they: Further editorial criteria may be applicable for different kinds of papers, as follows: Articles published in Nature have an exceptionally wide impact, both among scientists and, frequently, among the general public. The authors will be sent the comments of the reviewers and Editor and asked to revise accordingly. . Sample the courses for free. It is disappointing when you are rejected from a journal however it is important to know when it is appropriate to contest a decision and when to submit to another journal. The peer review file is published online as a supplementary peer review file. Reject: This is an outright rejection decision, and in most cases, the journal will not publish the paper or reconsider it even if the author makes major revisions. It just says editor assigned and manuscript under consideration. Dove Editorial has communicated the Editor-in-Chief's decision to the author (s) and Dove is awaiting a revised and/or resubmitted manuscript. Editors decisions are weighted according to the expertise of the referees, and not by a voting procedure. After the decision letter is sent, the author can respond to the offer via links in the letter or from their Author Main Menu. The Science Editor will examine the manuscript to see if it meets the basic acceptance criteria. For more information,please refer to our FAQ page. If the editors or reviewers have highlighted shortcomings with your paper that you think you can address please indicate how you would do this, such as providing further data. If the manuscript has been peer-reviewed, authors should include a note explaining any changes made to the manuscript compared to the original Nature Plants submission, along with a separate point-by-point response to the reviewer reports. [CDATA[// >