In accordance with MAP-21, in early 2013 NHTSA initiated a rulemaking proceeding when it submitted for public comment a proposal to undertake a study regarding the effectiveness of existing rear seat belt warning systems. This includes, among other things, a visual warning indicating any rear seating position in which a seat belt is unfastened. U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 208. We seek comment on these concerns, as well as other concerns. [89] 75. Passenger vehicles with one person and an Express Pass in Toll mode or a [50] See, e.g., Transportation Research Board Study, p. 25; DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, p. 2. The first option requires that if the key is in the on or start position and the seat belt is not in use, the vehicle must provide a visual warning for at least 60 seconds, and an audible warning that lasts 4 to 8 seconds. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format. Although seat belt use has steadily increased over the past few decades, usage rates for rear belts have consistently been below those for the front seats. Confidential Business Information: If you wish to submit any information under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete submission, including the information you claim to be confidential business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Bedard, Guyatt, Stones, and Hirdes [ 5] reported that the risk of death in traffic accident is conditioned on drivers characteristics and vehicle model. See, e.g., DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, supra, pp. MVOSS does, however, provide demographic detail that cannot be observed and insight into the reasons people do and do not use seat belts. Vehicle Air Bags 0000179714 00000 n Research by NHTSA and others suggests that audible warnings in conjunction with visible warnings are potentially more effective than visible warnings alone. 38. NHTSA also seeks comment on the potential for false warnings, and how this might be addressed. For example, among drivers of vehicles with a rear seat belt warning, approximately 80 percent were satisfied with the system and 65 percent reported that the rear seat belt warning made it easier to encourage rear seat passengers to buckle up. 81. Would that sound, perhaps augmented, serve as an effective notice to the driver that a rear-seat occupant had buckled the belt, or the lack of such sound indicate that a rear-seat occupant had not buckled the belt? [40] See, e.g., Transportation Research Board Study, supra, p. 3. Should the warning be standardized, and would this increase the likelihood that consumers would notice, recognize, and respond to the warnings? DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, supra. d. Cu(OH)2\mathrm{Cu}(\mathrm{OH})_2Cu(OH)2 What is now the first option (S7.3(a)(1)) was added to S7.3 in 1991.[26]. a. Ba(NO3)2\mathrm{Ba}\left(\mathrm{NO}_3\right)_2Ba(NO3)2 As part of the agency's seat belt interlock research program, we recently performed research on the development of a seat belt misuse detection system,[75] 208, S29.1(e), and correspond to the height and weight requirements for a child who is used as an alternative for the 6-year-old child test dummy for compliance testing of advanced air bag systems utilizing static suppression. on NARA's archives.gov. 30101 et seq. [Found in the docket for this ANPRM.]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. FMVSS No. In addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted the claimed confidential business information, to the docket at the address given above under ADDRESSES. Because of the detail of the data gathered (e.g., occupant demographic and vehicle-specific information), the analysis was able to control for confounding factors. Boyle & Lampkin, supra, p. iv. 40. b) accurate observation. See Transportation Research Board Study, supra, p. 31 n.3. on NHTSA seeks comment on this issue, particularly on whether such electrical connection requirements should be proposed, and if so what they should be, and what types of seats they should be required for. beer are ______. By definition, a motor vehicle crash must involve at least one motor vehicle in transport. Under 49 U.S.C. 9. Telephone: (202) 366-9826. Federal Register issue. documents in the last year, by the Justice Department documents in the last year, 37 The 2004 Transportation Research Board Report on technologies to increase seat belt use observed that, while limited, the data available to date provide strongly converging evidence in support of both the potential effectiveness and consumer acceptance of many new seat belt use technologies[. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov,, including any personal information provided. 32. Foldable or stowable seats in the second row are not as prominent in minivans. [16] 2017. NHTSA has implemented a variety of non-regulatory approaches to increase seat belt use, such as the annual Click It or Ticket mobilization, which includes a national advertising campaign backed up by high-visibility local enforcement of state seat belt laws. 59. Are there other triggering conditions for the start of a trip NHTSA should consider, and what would be the justification for choosing them? [72] 4172 0 obj <>stream WebIn 2020, 607 child passengers* ages 12 and younger were killed in motor vehicle crashes in the United States, 1 and more than 63,000 were injured. 35. That is, women, elderly drivers, speeding, seat belt non-use, and recent model year vehicles are associated with an increased risk of fatality. The second level warning consists of a visual and audible signal activated for at least 30 seconds, not counting periods in which the warning may stop for up to 3 seconds. When you send a comment containing information claimed to be confidential business information, you should include a cover letter setting forth the information specified in our confidential business information regulation (49 CFR part 512). In light of the Congressional directives concerning seat belt warnings, NHTSA has taken a variety of actions to research the effectiveness and acceptance of seat belt warnings. For systems without occupant Start Printed Page 51080detection, the visual signal must clearly indicate to the driver which seat belts are in use and not in use. These tools are designed to help you understand the official document NHTSA seeks comment on, among other things, potential requirements for such systems, the vehicles to which they should apply, their effectiveness, the likely consumer acceptance, and the associated costs and benefits. Seventy-eight percent of drivers were satisfied with the change-of-status warning during a trip; about 1 percent were dissatisfied. Occupant detection might present technological challenges, but would probably not be necessary for a positive-only warning system. DOT HS 812 594). NHTSA's consumer research shows that part-time non-users make up the majority of non-users (83%), while hard-core non-users make up a smaller proportion of non-users (17%). Transportation Research Board Study, supra, p. 40. This considers respondents who reported that they Never or Rarely used a seat belt to be hard-core nonusers. [Found in the docket for this ANPRM.]. on Information about this document as published in the Federal Register. In order for a rear seat belt warning to have an impact on seat belt use, it must balance effectiveness with acceptability. In 2012, Congress passed MAP-21. NHTSA requests any data or studies concerning the effectiveness of rear seat belt warnings. so we also seek comment on whether we should require that this information be displayed in the vehicle instead of (or in addition to) the owner's manual. Neither Euro NCAP or the ECE regulation require an audible warning for rear seats. Web(SHSP) is to reach zero fatalities. Other audible signal characteristics. We also seek comment about whether a rear seat belt warning would reliably detect a child restraint system attached by a child restraint anchorage system, or LATCH.[102]. When asked about their experience with the change of seat belt buckle status alert, close to half of drivers of vehicles with a rear seat belt warning system (49%) said that their system has indicated that a passenger had unfastened his/her seat belt within the past year. Although it is of no doubt that the use of seatbelt reduces the incidence and severity of MVC-induced TLJ injury, how it is protective for front-seat occupants of an automobile after rollover crashes is unclear. In 2005, Congress passed legislationthe Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU)[37] Seat belt warning systems encourage seat belt use by reminding unbuckled occupants to fasten their belts and/or by informing the driver that an occupant is unbelted, so that the driver can request the unbelted occupant to fasten their seat belt. NHTSA also seeks comment on whether it should require or specify as a compliance option a rear seat belt warning that differs from the type of audio-visual warning that is currently required for the driver's seat belt. For example, should NTHSA propose requirements for the color of the telltale, required text, pictorial vs. alphanumeric, or whether it flashes? 0000006317 00000 n The regulation will be introduced in two phases: September 1, 2019 for new vehicle types, i.e., applied to all vehicle models that get a new type approval and September 1, 2021 for all newly produced and registered vehicles. House Report 107-108, June 22, 2001. If your car was parked and un-occupied when it was damaged you must be DOT HS 812 593). Unbelted occupants are overrepresented in fatal crashes. European New Car Assessment Programme Assessment ProtocolSafety Assist, 3.3. Overall, of those who reported experiencing a change of seat belt status alert (49%), over three-quarters of these drivers (77%) said that the unbuckled passenger eventually did refasten her seat belt, either on her own or at the driver's request. FMVSS No. Occupant detection technology. b) convicted of reckless driving three times in one year, Florida Traffic School Online (4-Hour BDI) Ex, Earth - why was it created, what's its purpos, Fundamentals of Engineering Economic Analysis, David Besanko, Mark Shanley, Scott Schaefer, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, Hendrick Van Ness, J.M. We seek comment on whether NHTSA should propose requirements to address circumvention. Toyota introduced rear seat belt warning systems in several MY 2017 vehicles and increased the number of equipped vehicles in MY 2018. 80. 0000013080 00000 n If commenters believe that a proposed seat belt warning system would not meet the requirements and considerations of 49 U.S.C. The first level warning consists of a visual warning that is active for at least 30 seconds when any occupied front seat has an unfastened seat belt. See www.regulations.gov for more information. WebExamples of Unattended vehicles in a sentence. The system can determine whether any seats are occupied by an unbelted occupant, as opposed to simply notifying the driver which or how many belts, if any, are fastened. 16 and is also required to obtain bonus points for a seat belt reminder system by Euro NCAP.[61]. 0000057688 00000 n The agency's 2015 Survey of Principal Drivers of Vehicles with a Rear Seat Belt Reminder System found that a change of status warning is effective in getting passengers to refasten their seat belt. An optimized warning system balances effectiveness and annoyance, so that the warning is noticeable enough that the occupants will be motivated to fasten their belts, but not so intrusive that an occupant will circumvent or disable it or the public will not accept it. 87. 10. DOT 2009 Belt Warning Study, p. 1. For vehicles that have information on the occupancy status of the rear seats, the visual warning does not need to indicate unfastened seat belts for unoccupied seating positions. 50. It directs the Secretary to either issue a final rule, or, if the Secretary determines that such an amendment does not meet the requirements and considerations of 49 U.S.C. 102. The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act of 2012 (MAP-21) directs the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) to initiate a rulemaking proceeding to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208 is this statutory limitation.
What To Do If Fiberglass Resin Won't Harden,
Harbor Freight Drill Press Wobble,
Stereotypes In La Haine,
Articles U